|
|
Posted by George Hester on 10/17/22 11:26
"Nate" <thejedi@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:8FnUe.275$XO6.212@trnddc03...
> Charlie
>
> a problem here may be is that Celeron isn't exactly a very good processor.
i
> would reccomend a Pentium 4 or a Pentium M. There are people at Intel also
> bitching over it themselves they made a suckish chip.
>
> ::Nate::
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Oh my God Brian! There is a message in my Alpha Bits! It says
> 'oooooooooo'!" -Peter, Family Guy
> "Peter, those are cheerios." -brian, family guy's talking dog
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "speeder" <no.spam@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:10e3i1lplm68gfeivvur5865m6pphi12to@4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 15:12:21 GMT, "NTLworld" <charlie4fun@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Hi
> >>
> >>Has anyone notice the high processor usage in v3.53? Or is it me/ It
> >>takes
> >>up 80% of processing time on a Celeron 2.4Ghz.
> >>
> >>Anything I can do to reduce this?
> >>
> >>Regards
> >>
> >>Charlie
> >>
> >
> > Have you always had this problem? If it appears only now and then you
> > might be connecting to a fake source. I have seen certain bad IPs
> > generating this effect (either intentionally or as a side effect of
> > something else). When I disconnect them using TCPview, CPU percentage
> > instantly drops to regular levels.
> >
> > Get Peerguardian or Protowall and start blocking bad IPs. You shoud be
> > using either one even if you hadn't this in the first place.
>
>
We had a discussion once in a Newsgroup where the person wanted to know
should they get a slower P4 over a faster Celeron. I took your position and
was roundly chastised for it.
--
George Hester
_________________________________
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|