|
|
Posted by D.E. on 10/17/76 11:27
"FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> schreef in bericht
news:1127427610.641854.238920@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> Amun wrote:
>> "FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> wrote in message
>> news:1127355874.925156.176270@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> > Hardly a justification. Being the owner of something means you can not
>> > only set the price, but also decide whether to sell or not. If I
>> > decide to steal a car, the fact that the owner hadn't put it on the
>> > market doesn't change the fact that I've just taken a car that isn't
>> > mine. There are many compelling arguments for distinguishing file
>> > sharing from theft, but this is not one of them. Also, simply being
>> > out of print (thought they had a different term) doens't mean out of
>> > circulation - old record stores, individual collectors, E*bay offer a
>> > few of the avenues for obtaining hard-to-find music.
>> >
>> So if someone buys a used record from an old record store or ebay or just
>> downloads a copy off the net or gets and mp3 made.
>
> Is that a question? Sounds like you're asking what the difference is
> between DL'g an MP3 or just buying it used. Assuming that's what
> you're asking. then see above - when you buy an old album, you're
> buying what somebody else sold. The seller once bought that copy of
> "Kilroy was Here" and now sold it - trading his "license" to listen to
> that music for money.
Hahha not in my country, I could copy the CD keep thje copy and sell the
original again.
Totally legal. I am in sch a great country.
> There is still one copy of that album in
> circulation. DL/UL music is different - the seller probably purchased
> the music, but is now churning out copies of it. I doubt that RIAA
> would have an issue (a legit one anyway) if people were just ripping
> their own music, but P2P proves that this isn't the case.
So radio stations are distributing songs, hmmm . ;o)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|