|
|
Posted by Hammerer on 10/02/05 15:15
"George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:p5K%e.17015$7b6.4703@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>
> "Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:dhmjs6$qm5$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
> >
> > "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> top-posted
> > in message news:1zz%e.9626$K91.5670@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > >
> > > "Sundio" <me@nwre.com> wrote in message
> > > news:dhkace$p94$1@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net...
> > >
> > > >
> > > > First thanks to all who replied to my request.
> > > > George, do you have a dll file for win98se ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes but as it changes so often this one should get you going
> > > but you will need to find a better one I think. Here you go:
> > > http://home.nycap.rr.com/foryorisonly/WinMX_Patch.zip
> > >
> >
> > Nice one, George. That patch (for XP systems only) should
> > work wonders on poor Sundio's 98SE system. He'll really
> > need to find a better one, I think (!snurk!).
> >
> >
>
> It shouldn't be Hammerer.
>
It shouldn't be what?
>
> The person who made it said it was for Windows 98 specifically.
>
Please cite a source for that claim. A line in the batch file specifically
says . . .
"*** This patch may not work correctly on Windows 95/98/ME machines!"
.. . . Clearly, the "person" is as confused as you are.
>
> If it is not that isn't my fault. I just posted it for him
> never even looked at it myself.
>
There's the problem, George. Note that Sundio asked :
"George, do you have a dll file for win98se ?"
What you gave him isn't a DLL file. It's a simple batch-file. Which may, or
may not, work on his system. If you'd "looked at it yourself", you'd have
noticed.
>
> If you have problems with it I am sure we
> can hook you up to the writer and you can
> deal with them about it.
>
Don't "wriggle", dear George. Admit it . . . . you gave Sundio BAD advice.
YOU deal with it. No offence.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|