|
Posted by Hammerer on 10/09/05 18:17
"George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%yb2f.33521$K91.22776@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>
> "Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:434943e0$0$49021$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
> >
> > "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:cN92f.33502$K91.12564@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > >
> > > "Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:4349241b$0$49020$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
> > > >
> > > > "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:PO72f.33484$K91.22469@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > > Wait till you get hit with the Kernel corruption Root Kits.
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > So how did you manage to get "hit" by those, George?!
> > > >
> > >
> > > You know the answer Hammerer. Googling.
> > >
> >
> > Aaaaahh! Yes. George and his Awful Googling Experiences.
> > The *evil* Google, eh?! Am I right, George?
> >
> >
>
> Well actually its the awful sites Google makes available for me to
> click on. They really should enhance their search engine so that sites
> which are going to upload ActiveX and such things upon clicking on
> the links are banned. Same thing with popups. If they could do that
> we might see an end to this type of thing.
>
??? . . . . But, George - surely you can't expect Google, or anyone else, to
hold your hand for you while you're surfing the net? You are responsible for
your *own* security, or lack of it in your case. If you browse to unknown
sites with your ActiveX (and, presumably, Java, Cookie & active scripting)
permissions ON, then you've only got yourself to blame. What YOU suffered
from, there, was something only amateurs and fools suffer from. No offence.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|