|
|
Posted by ALBATOR on 09/28/16 11:25
"Joel" <joelx@usa.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
8fqbh1pf196i6khbubdssjos6pi1gq9g6s@4ax.com...
> It isn't, anymore. VBR has become more prevalent. I suspect that 192
> was chosen to keep the bit rate relatively low, while achieving decent
> quality with CBR, but 160 could have just as easily been chosen, in
> reality. Both are noticeably less close to CD quality than VBR,
> though, at least to many people's ears.
Sure, VBR is better but you setup cbr or vbr on a bite rate like 96 /
128 / 192 ...
often 192 win our choice for best quality. (with vbr now, rignt)
to encode there +two way for me:
with xing codec at 128 kbps > neuneu behavior > bullshit
EAC+PLEXTOR with last last lame codec with greet preset > my choice
EAC+PLEXTOR with muspack or ogg vorbis > star trek rules :)
I'm french, please write easy when you reply :)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|