|
|
Posted by anthonyberet on 09/13/05 22:40
FatKat wrote:
> This isn't the ruling - just the defendant's answer. From the looks of
> things, the reply shotguns a bunch of boilerplate legal/equitable rules
> (laches, statutes of limitations, dirty hands) and denials. My guess
> is that there is probably a model .pdf reply floating around somewhere,
> and this is one of them.
>
The ruling has not been made yet.
The defense is similar but not identical to the Santangelo case.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|