|
Posted by NRen2k5 on 09/27/05 02:36
On 9/24/2005 1:51:53 PM, "George Hester" wrote:
>"Hammerer" <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:43358cb6_2@x-privat.org...
>>
>> "George Hester" <hesterloli@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:z_fZe.2102$7b6.670@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>> >
>> > As far as I know RIAA "attcked" nothing. Their lawyers put the
>> > fear of God into P2P developers. That was all it took. The loss
>> > in Network as a direct response to RIAA lawyer threats. That is it.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, George. Otherwise known as an RIAA "attck".
>>
>>
>
>I suppose. But if the P2P developers didn't get cold feet the RIAA "attack"
>would have been useless. Wasn't an "attack" it was a "threat." There is a
>diference. We threatened Iraq and then we attacked them. I spz we could
>have just attacked them but then people would say it wasn't a "Just" war.
>The threat made it Just.
>
>--
>George Hester
>_________________________________
>
>
The threat of war if they didn't destroy *the WMD which they didn't have*... ? ;)
- NRen2k5
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|