|
Posted by dadiOH on 10/01/05 14:16
audiohead wrote:
> Converting the lossless wav back to MP3 using MP3 Pro encoder at a
> higher sample/bit rate (with some additional signal clean-up) than the
> original, actually did sound better than the original WMA. Perhaps a
> subjective and biased evaluation since I was never impressed with WMA
> to begin with. FLAC sounds like a good viable alternative.
You really don't have a clue, do you?
1. The wave decoded from the wma file wasn't lossless.
2. MP3 Pro encoder is only useful for making *LOW* bit rate files. And
only then if the resultant MP3 is played back with an MP3 Pro decoder.
--
dadiOH
____________________________
dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
....a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|