|
|
Posted by dadiOH on 10/03/05 11:06
audiohead wrote:
> What!!?? Nothing to say "Wizard of Geek?" The playback of MP3 Pro is
> an insignificant issue, especially since the decoder is a free
> download.
Hardly insignificant if one is using a device for playback on which the
MP3 "Pro" decoder can't be installed. Which is most.
_________________
> The MP3 Pro encoder was used for a distinct purpose.
Why yes, I remember...you were advocating "improving" a decoded WMA by
re-encoding it to MP3 with high bit/sample rates. That, of course, is
both incorrect and stupid. Even more stupid was your "clarification"
that the "lower bit rate MP3 Pro" MP3 sounded better.
Which is it, blubberhead..."lower bit rate MP3 Pro" or "encode at a high
bit and sampling rate"? The two are mutually exclusive.
__________________
> If I have to explain it to you then you don't belong on this forum,
and
> should enroll in the audio engineering school for the profoundly
> retarded.
Your general ignorance precludes your ability to explain anything.
--
dadiOH
____________________________
dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
....a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|