|
|
Posted by NRen2k5 on 10/17/64 11:29
On 10/6/2005 4:12:51 AM, "audiohead" wrote:
>Joel wrote:>
>>
>> Gee, that would make sense, using 48 KHz on a rip of an audio CD
>> (which was also made from 44.1 KHz AACs, as iTunes sells). Your
>> credibility is shrinking by the minute.
>
>"Gee" and "Rof"...Yeah?? I see your grammar hasn't improved much.
>Maybe the GED route would be more appropriate for you? And, I'm sure
>your superior, schizoid ears could distinguish between 48 and 44.1
>KHz?.
>
>>
>> Rofl! Yeah, I sure love going through the burn/rip process to save
>> time ...
>
>Have you ever heard of batch conversion? I thought even an uneducated
>"black sheep" geek like you would know this.
>
>>
>> Black Sheep--
>>
>> "Of course, it is ironic that a bonehead like Joel that
>> should be seeking to protect the First Amendment is seeking to
>> undermine it by claiming a monopoly on the phrase 'fair and moronic.'"
>> - Judge Denny Chin, referring to Fox News accusing Joel of
>> playing with himself too much.
>
>
Childish name calling aside... seriously, don't use 48kHz. CDDA is 44.1kHz. So when you use 48kHz, you're "resampling", and this hurts the sound quality.
- NREn2k5
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|