|
|
Posted by audiohead on 10/06/05 22:42
Joel wrote:
> >> Gee, that would make sense, using 48 KHz on a rip of an audio CD
> >> (which was also made from 44.1 KHz AACs, as iTunes sells). Your
> >> credibility is shrinking by the minute.
> >
audiohead wrote: "Gee" and "Rof"...Yeah?? I see your grammar hasn't
improved much.
Maybe the GED route would be more appropriate for you?
>
Black Sheep replied:
> I got my GED 10 years ago, and went to college for a year and a half.
> I suspect that is a far greater education than you will ever obtain.
A whole year and a half. I can't stop laughing....Was this year and a
half at the same GED college?
audiohead wrote: And, I'm sure
your superior, schizoid ears could distinguish between 48 and 44.1
KHz?.
Audiohead added [Time for a reality check egocentric moron. The world
doesn't revolve around you or your irrelevant data].
>
> Dude, the source is 44.1. Encoding an MP3 at a higher sample rate
> would be stupid, period.
See above "stupid." Where's the relevance?...unless your post GED
education (still laughing) has somehow given you the miraculous
perceptual ability to distinguish between 44.1 and 48.
>
> >> Rofl! Yeah, I sure love going through the burn/rip process to save
> >> time ...
> >
> >audiohead wrote: Have you ever heard of batch conversion? I thought even an uneducated
> >"black sheep" geek like you would know this.
>
> Have you ever actually used Hymn? It's very straightforward. Why the
> fuck would I burn audio CDs, only to waste time and effort, and not
> end up with the same quality once I reencoded them to MP3? I'd rather
> have an unprotected, original M4A. Duh.
>
I guess you have way too much time on your hands [suggestion - try a
hands free browser next time so you can continue to play with yourself
while posting this irrelevant post GED garbage] The newer iPods will
not authorize "hymned" .m4a which means additional workarounds are
needed. And, "Duh" Who wouln't rather have unprotected .m4a's. They
sound better than mp3.
> >> Black Sheep--
> >>
> >> "Of course, it is ironic that a bonehead like Joel that
> >> should be seeking to protect the First Amendment is seeking to
> >> undermine it by claiming a monopoly on the phrase 'fair and moronic.'"
> >> - Judge Denny Chin, referring to Fox News accusing Joel of
> >> playing with himself too much.
>
> You're retarded.
Suggestion: Seriously, have an individually administered IQ test
completed so we can all know what level of intellectual impairment you
have. Hint: Look up the code 318.2. No codec needed.
> >> Black Sheep--
> >>
> >> "Of course, it is ironic that a bonehead like Joel that
> >> should be seeking to protect the First Amendment is seeking to
> >> undermine it by claiming a monopoly on the phrase 'fair and moronic.'"
> >> - Judge Denny Chin, referring to Fox News accusing Joel of
> >> playing with himself too much.
> --
> Joel "Black Sheep" Crump
>
> "Of course, it is ironic that someone with 1.5 years of post GED education that
> should be seeking to protect the First Amendment [an amendment the black sheep hasn't entirely grasped] is seeking to > undermine it by claiming a monopoly on the phrase 'fair and retarded.'"
> - Judge Judy Chin, referring to Fox News accusing Black Sheep of
> continuing to play with himself too much.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|