|
Posted by Saucer Man on 10/15/85 11:29
Thanks for the info and the link!
"CQ" <me@privacy.com> wrote in message
news:1129459346.5c571418001931bccf1718d19af771bf@bubbanews...
> In article <-aCdnUSl5q3eT8zeRVn-qw@adelphia.com>, Saucer Man said...
>
>> I'm new to the .mp3 scene. Would there be a noticable difference between
>> 256 and 320 inside a car?
>
> No. Inside a car they would both be overkill.
>
> You could encode at 192 and likely not hear any loss of quality from the
> original inside a car unless you have excellent car audio and a virtually
> silent car.
>
> The best bet would be one of the lame presets. In a noisy listening
> environment, such as the typical car, <-V4--vbr-new> should be close to
> perceptual transparency and will be a far smaller file than 320 or 256.
>
> More information:
> http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?act=ST&f=15&t=28124
>
> --
> CQ
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|