|
|
Posted by Keith G on 10/15/02 11:30
"CQ" <me@privacy.com> wrote in message
news:1130423968.81c983a2e208793af2cf5eec4df7dc86@bubbanews...
> In article <gLidnZBaV5J5W_3eRVnyhw@pipex.net>, Keith G said...
>
>> OK, it's lunchtime, I'll play.... :-)
>
> Been let out to the playground, have you?
Hmm, weak start...
>
>> Btw, that'd be *arsehole* in ukra....
>
> Ah, but there is so much more to the world than your little rec.audio
> group.
Yes there's ukrav still alive and well apparently...??
> I don't know for sure, it was a guess, hence the "perhaps". I don't care
> much, it was more in the way of a musing. Nobody around here gives a
> shit
Doesn't look that way to me... :-)
but you do insist on inserting yourself in places where nobody cares
> about your opinions so you are going to have to accept those of others in
> return.
No sweetie, it's you MP3ers who are crossposting into ukra as far as I'm
concerned...
>
> Optionally, you could just have the maturity to not read that which you
> supposedly don't care/give a shit about, let alone respond to it.
What and pass up the chance to have a bit of fun with a prick like you??
Let me quote you the bit that sparked my response after the thread had been
running for nearly a week:
">
kkhkhkhkkgkgkkkkhkgkggkkkkhkjhlkuglkglkhglkhgklhglkhglkglkhgglkhgggggggggggg
> gggggggggggggglkjhgljkhglkhglhglkhglkhglkhglkjhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhg
> lkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhg
> lkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhglkhlkhglkhlkglklkhlkglkglkhglklkgklhglkg
> kljglkglkgklglkglkglkglkglkjglkjlkgklglkglkjgklglklkglklkglklkglkglkjglklkgl
> kjgkljglkglkglkglkglkglkg
>>
>> Have you figured it out yet? Keep working on it you stupid Hillbilly."
Indefensible really, isn't it?
But he wanks on regardless....
> Yet you attempted to above? You are in such a hurry to demean you miss
> the point and are demeaning yourself. Laughable.
I bet even you haven't got a clue what that nonsense means...??
> No, nobody said anything about you being obliged.
Oh, does that mean I don't get to invoice you then?
Are you comprehension
> challenged as well as attention deprived?
Fuck Nose. You tell me...
The fact is you chose to
> attempt to answer the original question. I merely pointed out that to do
> so required an opinion, not a simple yes or no.
>
> Note: "its answer requires". Clear enough for you?
>
> Seems you have a bit of a problem addressing the subject matter at hand
> and want to resort to silly deflection. No surprise.
No, I'm sorry, my attention wandered - what was that again?
>
>> So I do get to invoice you then? Simple yes or no will do - seeing as you
>> are so fond of yes or no answers...
>
> No, I think not. You have yet to deliver anything of value.
Really? Why are you queueing up for it then? Do you lack the maturity to
ignore something of no value?
> Yes, but of everything you've lost I'm sure you miss your manners the
> most, no? At least those strangers unlucky enough to encounter you in
> public places certainly must miss your manners.
I must be slipping, I thought I was being quite polite - I haven't used the
phrase 'wanker' yet, have I?
>
>> I guess....
>>
>> <shrug>
>
> Shrug? Is that meant to convey some sort of aloof lack of interest in
> the point made? If that is the case then why respond at all?
<shrug>
> You made an observation and an assumption that was in error. I corrected
> your erroneous observation. Nobody can prevent a person such as you from
> making assumptions, though.
Bummer, ain't it...?? ;-)
>
> Simple enough for you?
Oh yes, you certainly are!
> Ah, 'twas a matter of style. Forgive me if I don't always conform, in my
> writing in a relaxed and informal forum, to the pedantic and narrow
> minded view you seem to hold of what is and what is not correct.
>
>> - are you an American?
>
> Is this meant to imply that only Americans are capable of misusing
> punctuation?
It was a straightforward question. You read what imlications into you
like...
Are you so incredibly closed minded as to believe this?
Define 'incredibly'...
>
> Have you never heard of James Joyce?
What are you going to do when you leave school?
> Ah, so you are simply attempting to stir up shit because you find it to
> be fun. I suspected as much.
Bravo!!
(Even thickies like you catch on in the end!! :-)
>> You've said 'tit' twice now - do you like that word?
>
> Not particularly, no.
I do - it's succinct and comprehesive.
> "Leak into UK newgroups"? Is your group new? Is your spelling going to
> shite?
Still very weak....
>
> Also, since you want to be the grammar police, what's up with all these
> groups of four periods? Are they supposed to be ellipses? That's all
> botched up, Keith.
>
> An ellipsis is done like so: " . . . "
Don't fret too much about it - 'tis only a matter of style....
>
>> >
>> > He'll think you are saying he looks like a woman's breast.
>
>> There you go again!
>
> In order to "go again" I would have had to have repeated something I'd
> said or done previously.
>
> What exactly was that?
>
>> (I think you're enjoying this! :-)
>
> Watching you make an idiot and more than a bit of an ass out of yourself
Doesn't 'flow' - brackets would have helped there, I think - no?
> while you are trying to be clever yet showing yourself to be nothing more
> than an insufferable little pedant and a self-important fool has been
> mildly amusing, yes.
>
> However, you are quickly becoming quite boring.
Oh good, does that mean I won't have to deal with another of your pathetic,
pompous, pricky posts then?
>
> <snip>
>
>> > You came here whining
>
>> I think you're the one doing the *whining*
>
> Howzat again? Whining? Where would that be?
It's all one long whine...
>
>> moi beauty... ;-)
>
> Well, the "moi" is misplaced but the other is the first thing you've
> gotten even close to correct.
Oops, delusions of pulchritude here I suspect...
:-)
> Everyone can't be blessed with such mundane cognomens as yours, Mr.
> Garratt.
What do you suggest I change it to, Mr Q...???
>
> Rather conjures up an image of someone being unsuccessfully strangled in
> an attic, don't you think, Keith?
Hoo boy...
You tell me, C....
>
>> OTOH, if it is his real name, it shows he's got gut and doesn't hide
>> behind
>> summay tossy like 'CQ'....
>
> Hide behind? You seem to enjoy attempting insult where none exists. I'm
> not hiding behind anything. I'm using, as is the usenet convention, a
> "nym" or "nickname" to post. Many folks who regularly read this
> newsgroup know exactly who I am, where I live, what I do, etc. Hard to
> be hiding when I'm in such plain site.
Site?
I think *you* are the one whose spelling's going to shite, muchacho.. :-)
>> Fuckin' terrible ain't I?? ;-)
>
> Perhaps you would like to think so, but no. You are simply a typical
> usenet pest with an overblown opinion of yourself.
Your the one who's dribbling piss all over the carpet in ukra - why should
anyone give a toss (I use the word deliberately) what you think??
>
>> We can add hypocrite to the
>> > short list of attributes you have demonstrated in your short time in
>> > the
>> > amm group.
>>
>> Go on then, why not if it makes you happy...?? :-)
>
> Excuse me, but what sort of punctuation is that, exactly? Gone right
> down the toilet again, haven't you, Keith? You certainly do provide
> ample proof that even the British can butcher the English language, even
> while you continue to try and nitpick the usage of others and make broad
> and inapt generalizations about people you do not know.
>
> Yes, hypocrite it is then.
Pot/kettle as they say... :-)
(Fekkin' priceless this ole boy!!)
>
>> You'll have to excuse me now - me tea's cooled down a bit!
>
> I can't see how that concerns me or causes me to "have to excuse" you.
> Perhaps you meant "please excuse me now"
No, I was telling you, not asking your permission.
but we already know you have
> fuck-all for manners, right Keith old boy?
And you have the brass arse to try and pick me up on "Go on then, why not if
it makes you happy...??" :-)
Asitappens, I save my manners for people I like, respect and/or admire -
guess what, dipshit....???
LOL!!
:-))
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|