|
|
Posted by Luke Bosman on 10/15/31 11:36
fred-bloggs <fred-bloggs@hahahotmail.com> wrote:
> Verne Arase <VerneA@pobox.com> wrote in
> news:0001HW.BFE07C1D0012DDF6F0335550@news.giganews.com:
>
> > Actually, in order to get the quality of a 128 kpbs AAC, you need to
> > code your mp3s at about 192 kbps.
[...]
> In a set of public double-blind listening tests in 2004, the Lame 3.96
> mp3 encoder was rated *equal* to Itunes AAC 4.2 at 128 kbps CBR.
> http://www.rjamorim.com/test/multiformat128/results.html
Lame looks to be slightly inferior (4.18 vs. 4.26), although sample
sizes of 20 or so are hardly statistically valid.
Cheers,
Luke
--
No-one reads signatures these days.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|