|
|
Posted by NRen2k5 on 10/17/07 11:36
sbt wrote:
> In article <cOYuf.108549$J11.2266844@wagner.videotron.net>, NRen2k5
> <napsterneorenegade@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Warren Oates wrote:
>>
>>>In article <slrndro4jf.96a.nospam@debian.dns2go.com>,
>>> Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>The opinion(s) you pushed were all of a "Macs rule and windows drool"
>>>>type
>>>
>>>But that's true ...
>>
>>Actually, I'd like to see how some Macs compare to my PC when it comes
>>to encoding DivX movies. Purely out of curiosity.
>>
>
>
> Having done a lot of that sort of thing, we would need to start with
> the same content and have the same target framesize and framerate. Even
> with those conditions set, it will depend largely on which DivX encoder
> we each chose to use. If I use the one from the folks at DivX, I get a
> different encoding speed than I do from the one that comes with Toast,
> which is still a different speed from either the mencoder or ffmpeg
> DivX encoding tools in ffmpegX. I'm reasonably certain that similar
> differences between encoders exist on the Windows side (they do on the
> Linux side, too).
>
> Starting with "DV Stream" content of 58 minutes duration (came from a
> miniDV camcorder), I got a 1236 kbps 720x480 DivX (NTSC Film framerate
> of 23.976) in just under 42 minutes using ffmpegX on a dual 2GHz G5.
I'm impressed. What speed/quality setting (if there was any choice) was
the DivX encoder was set to?
In fps processed, looks like you're getting about 33? I get about 10, at
the "insane" setting, anyway.
- NRen2k5
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|