|
|
Posted by Michelle Steiner on 10/15/71 11:36
In article <FRpvf.806$vN4.623122@wagner.videotron.net>,
NRen2k5 <napsterneorenegade@hotmail.com> wrote:
> No, it takes practically zero effort to read.
As you have so ably demonstrated. It does take effort to read for
comprehension, as you have also demonstrated by your lack of effort.
> People ignore others like that not because it's "not worth their
> while" but because it's so damaging to their self esteem to be unable
> to back themselves up.
I bet that you're really so conceited that you actually believe that.
> >>In such a situation, any sane intelligent person will say "well,
> >>here's something my newsreader can't handle. My newsreader mustn't
> >>be too hot". Reality is, people aren't quite so clueless that
> >>they'd rather killfile somebody than get a working newsreader.
> >
> > No, the intelligent person will ask why you persist in violating
> > standards, and why you don't use a newsreader that adheres to the
> > standards.
>
> That's not the intelligent person.
I bet that you're really so conceited that you actually believe that.
--
Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|