|
Posted by Don M. on 01/08/06 19:01
"dadiOH" <dadiOH@wherever.com> wrote in message news:kpQvf.325$sa4.188@trnddc07...
> Rob Weekhout wrote:
>
> > Let us know what your opinion is about M.M !!!
>
> Since you asked...
>
> When it was SongsDB it just flat out didn't work. Not reliably. Does
> it now? It is better but I figure that if someone releases a flaky
> program they simply don't care and I'm not interested in future
> releases.
>
> It was also huge. Still is. "Huge" = five or more times the size of
> other similar and better programs.
>
> It also created a huge database - the equivalent of almost eight ID3V1
> tags for each and every song. Still does.
>
> It was very slow scanning for MP3s.
>
> My overall opinion is that there are many far better programs around.
>
==========
Excellent. Not to offend anybody, but I think it is plain stupid for people to choose
huge programs just because they have space to waste.
I'll take fast scans over slow ones any time, regardless of my hardware capabilities. My
2 of course.
Don
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|