|
|
Posted by NRen2k5 on 10/12/45 11:39
Jesse wrote:
> CQ <me@privacy.net> wrote in
> news:1124880793.9ffeaaf804fc7e56e0e569c39cfa9bc9@bubbanews:
>
>
>>In article <430c5b05$1@news.broadpark.no>, P.K. said...
>>
>>
>>>What program should I use to convert audio cd's to mp3, and I would
>>>also like to get the name and info of the songs unto the mp3's. I can
>>>do this with my Windows media player program, but then I don't get mp3
>>>files... When I try with Winamp, I don't get the name info. What size
>>>should I use, 192 or 256 kbps?
>>
>>I don't use it to rip but Winamp will lookup name info for CDs so I'm
>>pretty sure you can configure it to do the same for ripping.
>>
>>If you can't get it to do what you want you might try a small free
>>utility called CDex. It's very easy to set up and use.
>>
>>http://cdexos.sourceforge.net/
>>
>>As far as the 192 vs 256 goes, you should listen and decide for
>>yourself. Many people think 192Kbps is almost transparent and that
>>256Kbps is overkill and just makes the files too large. In the end it
>>depends on whether quality is more important than file size (to YOU) and
>>whether you are going to listen to the mp3s in a listening environment
>>where you would actually be able to discern any difference in quality
>>anyway.
>>
>>BTW, the best trade-off of file size/quality is obtained by using VBR
>>and setting your program to use one of the Lame presets, but that is a
>>whole different issue.
>
>
>
> CQ, your a walking copyright violation, not to mention a bonafide ball
> sucking maggot, so hows about you just shut the fuck up ?
Jessie, you walking assrape waiting to happen, we're talking about
copying your own CD's, which is perfectly legal you fucking idiot.
- NRen2k5
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|