|
|
Posted by guv on 05/29/10 11:30
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:17:41 +0000 (UTC), "Eric Jones"
<ejones999@btinternet.com> wrote:
>> Don't want to appear cold-hearted, but what is all the fuss about George
>> Best?
>> I am sorry to hear he is unwell. I wish him a speedy recovery and all
>> that.
>>
>> But first item on the news?
>>
>> OK he was a good footballer decades ago, but he achieved very little in
>> reality.
>> He seems to be more famous as a celebrity than a footballer.
>> But the way the news goes on about it, you would think the pope was dying.
>>
>> Loz
>A matter of opinion. To me George Best means more to me than all the Popes
>that have ever been!
>There has never been IMO a better player from British Isles (in my lifetime
>anyway 1960-)
Whilst that later may well be true, the fact remains, that George was
given a new lease of life, which he has also abused to the point it
now looks that he's gambled again and lost.
He is a celebrity granted and as such will be in the news. But front
page? If thats the most important news available, then there must be
little going on in the world ATM.
--
www.senaction.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|