|
|
Posted by Daniel White on 05/15/96 11:30
"guv" <guv69@msn.com> wrote in message
news:0u82m19tkv4ddidvb2a4hg6q3vremnqbqt@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:17:41 +0000 (UTC), "Eric Jones"
> <ejones999@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>>> Don't want to appear cold-hearted, but what is all the fuss about George
>>> Best?
>>> I am sorry to hear he is unwell. I wish him a speedy recovery and all
>>> that.
>>>
>>> But first item on the news?
>>>
>>> OK he was a good footballer decades ago, but he achieved very little in
>>> reality.
>>> He seems to be more famous as a celebrity than a footballer.
>>> But the way the news goes on about it, you would think the pope was
>>> dying.
>>>
>>> Loz
>>A matter of opinion. To me George Best means more to me than all the Popes
>>that have ever been!
>>There has never been IMO a better player from British Isles (in my
>>lifetime
>>anyway 1960-)
>
> Whilst that later may well be true, the fact remains, that George was
> given a new lease of life, which he has also abused to the point it
> now looks that he's gambled again and lost.
>
> He is a celebrity granted and as such will be in the news. But front
> page? If thats the most important news available, then there must be
> little going on in the world ATM.
>
>
>
>
> --
> www.senaction.com
Have no sympathy for him. Wasted the 2nd chance he was given. Someone else
could have done better with it.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|