|
|
Posted by Phillip Kyle on 10/29/05 21:26
ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in
news:23e8f.31979$gF4.23048@trnddc07:
> Phillip Kyle wrote:
>> peterparsnip@gmail.com (Peter Parsnip) verbally sodomised in
>> news:djmbqc$46j$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>>> Be still! and revere Phillip Kyle, who blessed us with their presence
>>> on 25 Oct 2005...
>>>
>>>> peterparsnip@gmail.com (Peter Parsnip) verbally sodomised in
>>>> news:djlumc$set$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Be still! and revere Phillip Kyle, who blessed us with their
>>>>> presence on 25 Oct 2005...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ted Capuano <lx3nwn7@kzhg6.com> verbally sodomised in
>>>>>> news:ko0rl1tncp7t19943jqcndm65mj5ib0htb@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:23:52 +0000 (UTC), "Richard Dewsbery"
>>>>>>> <richard@dewsbery.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Yes, it's that special time again. So please do not feed the
>>>>>>>>trolls. Particularly the cross-posting variety.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you the Richard Dewsbery who wrote this to the now exposed
>>>>>>> private mailing list "ng_abuse"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <Quote>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ISPs have to tread warily where posters using their services are
>>>>>>> libelling other people. Although I am not a media lawyer, I would
>>>>>>> cite as authority for the proposition that an ISP can be liable
>>>>>>> for acts of its subscribers the case of Godfrey vs Demon Internet.
>>>>>>> Although the case was ultimately settled out of court by Demon, a
>>>>>>> first instance ruling had held that they could be liable for
>>>>>>> carrying posts authored by a third party if they didn't remove the
>>>>>>> posts when asked from the servers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The effect of this is to make all ISPs think carefully about
>>>>>>> whether they want bloody nuisances as customers, as each time the
>>>>>>> nuisance posts something insulting the victim can complain, and if
>>>>>>> the message isn't deleted at source, the ISP gets to pay damages.
>>>>>>> After a few complaints from different individuals, the ISP is well
>>>>>>> advised to pull the account rather than risk missing a few
>>>>>>> deletions and getting whacked by a High Court defamation suit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I gather that some of the current crop of most virulent trolls may
>>>>>>> be real people, with an academic access to the net. Either the
>>>>>>> academic establishment is acting as its own ISP, or it has an
>>>>>>> outside ISP - it matters not, a few cease and desist letters and
>>>>>>> either ought to pull the offenders' net priveleges. Regardless of
>>>>>>> what certain news server admins may think about it (letters
>>>>>>> involving lawyers in suits usually end up on more important
>>>>>>> desks).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What we need is concrete evidence of how the messages are being
>>>>>>> posted, and by whom and to what servers; some innocent victims who
>>>>>>> have been the subject of defamatory postings; and some sharply-
>>>>>>> worded letters before action to the ISP or establishment through
>>>>>>> which the abuse has been posted. Sledgehammer to crack a nut, but
>>>>>>> it seems that the only other solutions require us to put up with
>>>>>>> the little gits. I'll happily help out with any letters before
>>>>>>> action - with the provisos that I'm not an expert on defamation,
>>>>>>> nor will I be involved in any litigation either as claimant or
>>>>>>> representative.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> </Quote>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, he's also the kind gentleman who sent me this nice email:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Quote>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From : Richard Dewsbery <richard@dewsbery.freeserve.co.uk>
>>>>>> Sent : Saturday, January 3, 2004 1:07 PM
>>>>>> To : <philkyle2003@hotmail.com>
>>>>>> Subject : Crossposting Twats
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>>> Received: from dswu232.btconnect.com ([193.113.154.43]) by
>>>>>> mc11-f7.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 3
>>>>>> Jan 2004 05:09:02 -0800 Received: from xpbox (actually host
>>>>>> 242.116.120.213.in-addr.arpa) by dswu232 with SMTP-CUST (XT-PP);
>>>>>> Sat, 3 Jan 2004 13:07:38 +0000 X-Message-Info:
>>>>>> JGTYoYF78jExmRhYTKFgsFwAHHwYGw7B X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>>>>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
>>>>>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
>>>>>> Return-Path: richard@dewsbery.freeserve.co.uk
>>>>>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2004 13:09:03.0051 (UTC)
>>>>>> FILETIME=[C26DC9B0:01C3D1FA]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>>>>> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008D_01C3D1FA.834FA550"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
>>>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you the twat that is cross-posting all sorts of garbage to half
>>>>>> the UK newsgroups, or an unwittin g victim of some other twat using
>>>>>> your website address?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> R M Dewsbery
>>>>>>
>>>>>> </Quote>
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like a clown we should go after :-)
>>>>>
>>>> Indeedy. Let's just say URC for good measure.
>>>>
>>>> Imagine if I was a completely innocent poster with that email address
>>>> and that landed in it. Do you think I'd reply?
>>>
>>> I can't help but feel that I would be committing suicide if my name
>>> was R M Dingleberry.
>>>
>>
>> I'm sure he got teased at school. I bet he became a hall monitor so he
>> could wreak his vengance by being a jobsworth.
>
> 'jobsworth' . . . I like that.
>
> We never had anything like that when I was growing up.
COunt yourself lucky. Lots of adult jobsworths as well. Most of them seem
to reside in uk.*
--
Phil Kyle
http://philkyle2003.reachme.at/
"The truly racist person is one Helene Rudlin, who admits it."
- Neil Barker <MPG.1c47999866a4baf798976c@127.0.0.1>
"I wonder - is there perhaps some form of cosmetic surgery we can pay for,
so that Helene can actually become a coon ?"
- Neil Barker <MPG.1c479b87e7a43ce989770@127.0.0.1>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|