|
|
Posted by Phillip Kyle on 10/30/05 21:24
ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in
news:gHT8f.2110$sF6.219@trnddc03:
> Phillip Kyle wrote:
>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised in
>> news:23e8f.31979$gF4.23048@trnddc07:
>>
>>> Phillip Kyle wrote:
>>>> peterparsnip@gmail.com (Peter Parsnip) verbally sodomised in
>>>> news:djmbqc$46j$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Be still! and revere Phillip Kyle, who blessed us with their
>>>>> presence on 25 Oct 2005...
>>>>>
>>>>>> peterparsnip@gmail.com (Peter Parsnip) verbally sodomised in
>>>>>> news:djlumc$set$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be still! and revere Phillip Kyle, who blessed us with their
>>>>>>> presence on 25 Oct 2005...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ted Capuano <lx3nwn7@kzhg6.com> verbally sodomised in
>>>>>>>> news:ko0rl1tncp7t19943jqcndm65mj5ib0htb@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:23:52 +0000 (UTC), "Richard Dewsbery"
>>>>>>>>> <richard@dewsbery.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Yes, it's that special time again. So please do not feed the
>>>>>>>>>>trolls. Particularly the cross-posting variety.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you the Richard Dewsbery who wrote this to the now exposed
>>>>>>>>> private mailing list "ng_abuse"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <Quote>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ISPs have to tread warily where posters using their services are
>>>>>>>>> libelling other people. Although I am not a media lawyer, I
>>>>>>>>> would cite as authority for the proposition that an ISP can be
>>>>>>>>> liable for acts of its subscribers the case of Godfrey vs Demon
>>>>>>>>> Internet.
>>>>>>>>> Although the case was ultimately settled out of court by Demon,
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> first instance ruling had held that they could be liable for
>>>>>>>>> carrying posts authored by a third party if they didn't remove
>>>>>>>>> the posts when asked from the servers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The effect of this is to make all ISPs think carefully about
>>>>>>>>> whether they want bloody nuisances as customers, as each time
>>>>>>>>> the nuisance posts something insulting the victim can complain,
>>>>>>>>> and if the message isn't deleted at source, the ISP gets to pay
>>>>>>>>> damages. After a few complaints from different individuals, the
>>>>>>>>> ISP is well advised to pull the account rather than risk missing
>>>>>>>>> a few deletions and getting whacked by a High Court defamation
>>>>>>>>> suit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I gather that some of the current crop of most virulent trolls
>>>>>>>>> may be real people, with an academic access to the net. Either
>>>>>>>>> the academic establishment is acting as its own ISP, or it has
>>>>>>>>> an outside ISP - it matters not, a few cease and desist letters
>>>>>>>>> and either ought to pull the offenders' net priveleges.
>>>>>>>>> Regardless of what certain news server admins may think about it
>>>>>>>>> (letters involving lawyers in suits usually end up on more
>>>>>>>>> important desks).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What we need is concrete evidence of how the messages are being
>>>>>>>>> posted, and by whom and to what servers; some innocent victims
>>>>>>>>> who have been the subject of defamatory postings; and some
>>>>>>>>> sharply- worded letters before action to the ISP or
>>>>>>>>> establishment through which the abuse has been posted.
>>>>>>>>> Sledgehammer to crack a nut, but it seems that the only other
>>>>>>>>> solutions require us to put up with the little gits. I'll
>>>>>>>>> happily help out with any letters before action - with the
>>>>>>>>> provisos that I'm not an expert on defamation, nor will I be
>>>>>>>>> involved in any litigation either as claimant or representative.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> </Quote>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, he's also the kind gentleman who sent me this nice email:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <Quote>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From : Richard Dewsbery <richard@dewsbery.freeserve.co.uk>
>>>>>>>> Sent : Saturday, January 3, 2004 1:07 PM
>>>>>>>> To : <philkyle2003@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>> Subject : Crossposting Twats
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>>>>> Received: from dswu232.btconnect.com ([193.113.154.43]) by
>>>>>>>> mc11-f7.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 3
>>>>>>>> Jan 2004 05:09:02 -0800 Received: from xpbox (actually host
>>>>>>>> 242.116.120.213.in-addr.arpa) by dswu232 with SMTP-CUST (XT-PP);
>>>>>>>> Sat, 3 Jan 2004 13:07:38 +0000 X-Message-Info:
>>>>>>>> JGTYoYF78jExmRhYTKFgsFwAHHwYGw7B X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>>>>>>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
>>>>>>>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
>>>>>>>> Return-Path: richard@dewsbery.freeserve.co.uk
>>>>>>>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2004 13:09:03.0051 (UTC)
>>>>>>>> FILETIME=[C26DC9B0:01C3D1FA]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>>>>>>> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008D_01C3D1FA.834FA550"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
>>>>>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you the twat that is cross-posting all sorts of garbage to
>>>>>>>> half the UK newsgroups, or an unwittin g victim of some other
>>>>>>>> twat using your website address?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> R M Dewsbery
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> </Quote>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks like a clown we should go after :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeedy. Let's just say URC for good measure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Imagine if I was a completely innocent poster with that email
>>>>>> address and that landed in it. Do you think I'd reply?
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't help but feel that I would be committing suicide if my name
>>>>> was R M Dingleberry.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure he got teased at school. I bet he became a hall monitor so
>>>> he could wreak his vengance by being a jobsworth.
>>>
>>> 'jobsworth' . . . I like that.
>>>
>>> We never had anything like that when I was growing up.
>>
>> COunt yourself lucky. Lots of adult jobsworths as well. Most of them
>> seem to reside in uk.*
>
> Hmmm . . . there might be something to this.
>
> Are they all Catholic?
I doubt it.
--
Phil Kyle
http://philkyle2003.reachme.at/
"The truly racist person is one Helene Rudlin, who admits it."
- Neil Barker <MPG.1c47999866a4baf798976c@127.0.0.1>
"I wonder - is there perhaps some form of cosmetic surgery we can pay for,
so that Helene can actually become a coon ?"
- Neil Barker <MPG.1c479b87e7a43ce989770@127.0.0.1>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|