|
|
Posted by Mr Wiffy on 11/17/05 20:37
"Alex" <alex1385NOSPAM@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:KoScnY2Hnb6TlObeSa8jmw@karoo.co.uk...
|
| "DH" <nowhere@nohow.com> wrote in message
| news:%vsef.8959$Lw5.5198@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| > Turbohat wrote:
| > > Was planning to but the R1 but the R2 2 disc version was so, so cheap
in
| > > Tesco (only 12.77)
| > >
| > > Checked out the disc today briefly and 2 questions leap to mind after
| seeing
| > > it at the cinema (and not paying much attention at the time).
| > >
| > > 1stly, was it originally shown in 1.85:1 (as the DVD is) at the
cinema.
| With
| > > a BIG!!!! film I was expecting the usual ultra-wide 2.35 or 2.40:1
| > >
| > > Secondly, the picture seems very over-exposed (to use a photography
| > > description), under saturated in terms of colour, and verym, very,
| VERY!!!!
| > > grainy. I remember it being underaturated at the cinema, but don't
| recall
| > > the grain. Again, is this as per the original?
| > >
| > > Thanks
Yes its 1.85:1, and yes it is grainy. That's for effect!
HTH.
Ian
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|