|
|
Posted by John Howells on 01/02/06 16:18
"Frankymole" <ask_for_it@onthegroup.com> wrote
> "Ian Salsbury" <Ian@salsbury42.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:dp8d2i$n9g$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
> >
> >
> >> BTW, Am I the only one who thinks the box is amazingly naff? Before I
> >> could
> >> put the disks on the shelf I had to put them in a normal six-disk case.
> >> If
> >> there had been a choice between the 'full monty' box and a normal case
I
> >> would have chosen the normal case, and left the collectors to have the
> >> fancy
> >> box! Thank goodness for http://art.gmaskew.com/acemel/eccleston.htm
> >
> > Far from it, just about everyone who`s voiced an opinion on it thinks
it`s
> > crap. Mine`s starting to fall apart and takes up far more room than is
> > neccessary. I like those covers though, if I had a printer that could do
> > them justice I`d download one!
>
>
> I did download one - its a blurry jpg!!!
>
> Why not bitmaps? You can't read the text on them.
They work fine for me. All the text is clearly legible on the printed cover,
even the masses of small text in the 'Special Features' box on the Series
One box set cover. The only text that even begins to approach 'blurry' is
the tiny "illustration by" and the grey copyright statement, but even they
are clearly legible.
John Howells
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|