|
|
Posted by doc on 09/26/12 11:26
hey thanks for the input. definately helps in the decision process. did i
read you to say you can fix the shortcoming of the fixed lense by use of
adapters to get a wide angle?
doc
"Moving Vision" <mv@movingvision.co.uk> wrote in message
news:x1hXJsK9VXIDFwiP@movingvision.demon.co.uk...
> In article <Fy4Ue.2116$0Q2.127@trndny01>, doc <doc@drdimento.net> writes
>>anyone out there have any experience with the Sony FX1 or Z1U?
>>
>>i am thinking of buying one or two of them and need to know what kind of
>>picture quality they/either produces AND how well they interface with
>>firewire inputs AND their HDV quality.
>>
>>please jump in one and all and shoot me ur insight. all comments (good
>>and
>>bad) appreciated.
>>
>>doc
>>
>>
>
>
> Have both. The Z1 has very worthwhile benefits over the FX1, including
> balanced audio XLR and the ability to shoot 1080i HDV, 50i and 60i DV and
> DVCAM for both PAL and NTSC.
>
> Both serve capably as edit VCR's with firewire, component, Y/C and
> composite interfaces.
>
>
> Picture quality in HDV is astonishing, significantly better than any SD
> format including Digi Beta. In DV or DVCAM mode the picture quality is
> close to the DSR500/570. Only the fixed lens limits depth of field options
> in comparison and even this can be worked around with the use of adapters.
>
> There's a good reason why the Z1 is currently the worlds bst selling
> professional camera ever. (Don't let the Ludites in vested interest
> denial, the ones, even if only for pragmatic business reasons)
> --
> John Lubran
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|