|
|
Posted by doc on 09/14/05 23:36
hi and thanks for the response. i know they'll air it because we pay them
too but what i'm especially worrried about is whether the end result of
converting from 12+ year old betamax to digital at SD with the Sony FX1 +
liquid edition pro as the editor will lower our quality, equal our quality,
or improve our quality.
i ran a test on a little handycam from panasonic (entry level consumer
product) and the result is much lower than our present taping arrangement
but then our betacam's cost something like 20 g's each new THEN and although
i don't know the exact spec's i think their something like 400 lines of res
or thereabouts.
so, afterthoughts?
doc
"ushere" <kaywand@REMoVEaBUSebigpond.com> wrote in message
news:oe2We.47486$FA3.34536@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> anything is broadcast quality if a broadcaster wants to show it.
>
> leslie
>
> (produced broadcast doco's from vhs thru digibeta to dv. if they like it,
> they'll pay and air).
>
> "doc" <doc@drdimento.net> wrote in message
> news:GJXVe.14836$FT6.12722@trndny02...
>> Hi group. I've posted under some other headers looking for comparisons
>> between the Sony FX1 nad Sony Z1U and found there to be little difference
>> and thus wanted to know if anyone else has used the Sony FX1 for
>> broadcast quality material? Or, if anyone out there knows what we're
>> wanting to do witll work?
>>
>> We currently use 12 year old Sony cameras (expensive in their day) and
>> Sony Betacam recorder and do a "live" production through Sony switching
>> and mixing panel(s) and want to go to post production so that we don't
>> have to start over every time when something goes wrong :o)
>>
>> Thus, we want to convert to the Sony FX1's recording to DV, then capture
>> the footage into Liquid Edition or Canopus Edius Pro 3, then edit and dub
>> out to DVD, Sony Betamax SP and Sony SVHS formats for delivery to our
>> local, nationwide, and satellite networks and want to see if there are
>> any who can confirm that the quality of the programming will not be
>> sacrificed (and maybe even improved :o) from our present arrangement.
>>
>> Please help and many thanks in advance.
>>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|