|
|
Posted by doc on 09/18/05 01:23
how do you like the DVX100A 4:3 format as compared to 16:9? and do you
believe that the quality of the output is less than, equal to, or better
than, Sony betacam records?
thanks in advance,
doc
"Jack Perry" <vidpro401234@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:9QuVd.6708$Wk.5424@fe11.lga...
> It's not bad in low light situations, but the PD170 produces a better less
> noisy picture
> under low light. That said, and I have both, the cine gamma and the color
> blacks, saturation and 24p of the DVX100A rock the house and give you more
> of a film type look. Friends of mine use the 100A for killer wedding
> videos that consistantly win awards in local pva's and WEVA. Get yourself
> a frezzi onboard light and some extendo batteries and you'll be all
> set. --- JP
>
>
>
>
> "Henry Padilla" <padillah@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:afpVd.9619$jr5.6746@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
>> I'm new to the Wedding/Event Videography arena and I am looking at
>> getting
>> some new equipment.
>>
>> I'd like to know if anyone has any experience with the Panasonic
>> AG-DVX100A.
>> How good is it in low-light siuations? How is the sound from the
>> on-camera
>> mic? What kind of levels can I expect with a seperate mic?
>>
>> Any information would be appreciated.
>> Thanks,
>> Tom Padilla
>>
>>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|