|
|
Posted by doc on 09/20/05 14:51
hehehe. i agree with you wholeheartedly and would ad that the content is
just as bad and immoral but that area you all have us beat. alhtough, this
is part of this thread, what the heck - - myself i would like to see
programming improve and have the "Good Practice" seal re-instutited but
without gays and lesbians and minorities being represented because we (the
US) were founded on a Christian basis and THAT flavor is in the constitution
yet the liberals won't stop until they've destroyed that foundation
listening to Satan AND now we see why 911 terror has come to our country and
hurricane's are destroy our financial strength - - it's called THE WRATH OF
GOD !!
at least in the UK while there are those who are immoral and the airways
have it broadcast down deep in the root is a heart that fears God and
country. not so in the fastly becoming foreigner state and strange
religioins.
doc
"Moving Vision" <mv@movingvision.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5sqF$yJeq+LDFwK3@movingvision.demon.co.uk...
> In article <KeLXe.4287$iu5.1939@trndny04>, doc <doc@drdimento.net> writes
>>thanks for the input Mike. yes it is Sony BetacamSP. does that make a
>>difference? from what we view weekly, it looks pretty grainy actually.
>>you
>>say others say the quality of it is better than that of the DVX100A?
>>
>>also, any ideas why the color balance would go off if it was in auto? i'm
>>assuming that they were in auto right?
>>
>>doc
>
> The thing about Beta SP and the many two bit local TV stations that you
> have plenty of in the USA is that Beta SP needs a high level maintenance.
> As the heads slowly deteriorate these two bit stations often don't seem to
> notice that their footage has degraded well below the proper Beta SP
> standard, often reminds me of African and other third world stations that
> do the same thing. You almost never see such degraded Beta SP footage in
> the UK unless it's news from the USA or Africa!
> --
> John Lubran
>
> "It's a mistake to take your own case for a generality"
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|