|
|
Posted by AnthonyR on 09/25/05 17:08
"Richard Crowley" <rcrowley@xpr7t.net> wrote in message
news:11jbp1e13scru92@corp.supernews.com...
> "AnthonyR" wrote ...
>> Richard, i respect your perfectionism when it come to highest quality
>> possible video capture. And also agree about
>> the miniDVD camcorders. Although for capturing family videos, they still
>> are a huge leap forward to what I had growing up which was
>> 8mm film, 3 minutes at a time, needed developing and had scratches and
>> dust after a while not to mention, film was just difficult to set up view
>> and enjoy.
>> So compared to that, I think we both agree, a miniDVD camcorder even with
>> it's 20 minutes limitation, and mpeg capture, limited editing etc..
>> is so much better than home movies enthusiasts and hobbyist had to use in
>> the past generations. Right? :)
>
> I am infamous in these circles for my skepticism of temporally-
> compressed formats (video and audio).
>
> According to a post just yesterday in rec.arts.movies.production.sound,
> Kodak recently announted a new super-8 film stock for professional
> use.
Richard,
How interesting, new super 8 film from kodak, hmmm?
Poor kodak actually, they are victims of technology. They try and try to
move over to digital photography to maintain their cominant position in the
field but
the days of film are in the past, and they don't have a monopoly lead in the
digital market.
Maybe they now feel, if they can bring back film? Can't blame them for
trying stuff.
It's tuff when technology finds better ways to do stuff and old ways no
longer are needed.
Sort of like when pampers were invented, lol Diaper Service slowly dwindled
away.
Same for the milkman. :)
AnthonyR.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|