|
|
Posted by George Hammond on 10/11/05 12:34
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:21:12 GMT, George Hammond
<ghammond1@earthlink.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:07:55 -0000, "Dave" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>>[Dave]
>>i hate to have to point out the obvious, especially if it defends 'spog'...
>>but the way he made that 'prediction' it is impossible to prove it false.
>>of course you may also never be able to prove it true either, but you
>>definately can't prove it false.
>
>
>[Hammond]
>Whaddaru talking about?
>
>You make the 10 second video clip (as described below and posted
>MANY TIMES), and then you assemble 10 adults (all over age 18)
>and 10 children ages 5-8 years old to watch it (simultaneously... all
>20 of them)... on a single t.v. set.
>
>Then you ask the kids... did you see the movie?... answer: "No...
>it just looked like a blank screen".
>
>Then you ask the adults... did you see the movie?....answer: " YES...
>it was a movie of the Kentucky Derby and horse #77 won
>the race".
>
>OK.... that's PROOF POSITIVE.... what the hell are you
>talking about "impossible to prove".... you're a screwball.
>
>
>--------------original post-----------------------
>[Hammond]
>It is a TESTABLE prediciton.
>
>thousands of people have asked me to post a
>TESTABLE PREDICITON of the SPOG (scientific
>Proof of God)
>
>Well, here it is, I predict that:
>
> IT IS POSSIBLE TO MAKE A VIDEO MOVIE
> WHICH IS VISIBLE TO AN ADULT, BUT
> WILL BE INVISBLE TO A KID.
>
>that is a TESTABLE PREDICTION of the SPOG, since
>such a thing has NEVER been done before!
>
>[Hammond]
>... here's how the video is to be made:
>
>In fact, it is known (Riedel 1966) that a
>1/15 of a second flash CAN be seen by and adult, but
>not by the kid..... in fact you have to increase the
>lenght of the flash to 1/10 of a second before the kid can
>see it.
>
>This is why the PFF (picture fusion frequency) of adults
>is known to be 15 frames/sec, but for a 7 year old it
>is known to be 10 frames/second (Riedel 1966).
>
>OK... this tells you that if you make a "movie" out of
>a series of brief flashes (1 or 2 video frames) which
>are too short to be Seen by a kid, but long enough to be
>seen by an adult.... voila...you have made a (crude)
>movie that is VISBLE to an adult, but is INVISIBLE
>to a child.
>
>
>For instance, using ordinary 30 frames/second video,
>I predict that the following video clip will be a movie
>that will be VISIBLE to an adult, and INVISIBE to a
>kid of 5 years old:
>
>
>01|02|...|...|...|...|07|08|...|...|...|...|13|14|...|...|...|...|19|20|...|..|...|...|25|26|...|...|...|...|-------repeat10times------>
>
>(NOTE: this is 1-second of a standard video, to make
>the movie clip simply repeat it ten times to make a 10
>second vido clip)
>
> NOTE:
>
>----->|...|<------ = 1/30 of a second (one frame)
>
>----->|19|20|<----- = 1/15 of a second (2 frames)
>
>----->|...|...|...|...|<------ = 1/7.5 of a second (4 frames)
>
>The numbered frames are frames from an actual REAL MOVIE video, while
>the |...| frames are BLANK (light gray) frames.
>
>Remember, 2 frames is 2(1/30) = 1/15 of a second, so the ADULT
>should see the numbered frames. The 4 repeated |...| frames take
>1/7.5 seconds, so the kid can see those, but he cannot see the double
>numbered frames.
>
>So it is clear to me that the above sequence will be a VISIBLE MOVIE
>to an adult...... but will be an INVISIBLE MOVIE to a 5 year old
>kid............ and this constitutes a PROOF that there is an
>INVISBLE WORLD which more fully GROWN people can SEE, but
>which less fully GROWN people CAN'T SEE.
>
>
>[Hammond]
>SO.... I have just made a TESTABLE PREDICTION of the SPOG... and
>anyone is free to get out his video editor on his desktop computer
>and TEST IT. Until then,
>
> PUT Up OR SHUT UP!
>
>
>========================================
> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
>http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> mirror site:
>http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
>=======================================
>Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
>Send a blank email to COSAchurch@hotmail.com
>and your email address will be added to the
>COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
>===========================
>and please ask your news service to add:
>alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
>===========================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|