|
|
Posted by Dave on 10/11/05 12:45
"George Hammond" <ghammond1@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:u9ank1lphlg3erm56brac9r49kl1qs9cg3@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:32:52 -0000, "Dave" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"TMG" <TMG@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
>>news:e9qdnVRux7SRU9feRVn-rA@comcast.com...
>>>
>>> TMG wrote:
>>>> George Hammond wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> [Hammond]
>>>>> It is a TESTABLE prediciton.
>>>>>
>>>>> thousands of people have asked me to post a
>>>>> TESTABLE PREDICITON of the SPOG (scientific
>>>>> Proof of God)
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, here it is, I predict that:
>>>>>
>>>>> IT IS POSSIBLE TO MAKE A VIDEO MOVIE
>>>>> WHICH IS VISIBLE TO AN ADULT, BUT
>>>>> WILL BE INVISBLE TO A KID.
>>>>>
>>>>> that is a TESTABLE PREDICTION of the SPOG, since
>>>>> such a thing has NEVER been done before!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And IT CAN'T BE DONE. Your prediction fails. The SPOG is scientifically
>>>> falsified.
>>>>
>>>> If you have evidence to the contrary, post it.
>>
>>i hate to have to point out the obvious, especially if it defends
>>'spog'...
>>but the way he made that 'prediction' it is impossible to prove it false.
>>of course you may also never be able to prove it true either, but you
>>definately can't prove it false.
>
>
> [Hammond]
> Whaddaru talking about?
<rant snipped>
READ WHAT I SAID! I AM SUPPORTING YOU(darn it)! i said that the statement
you made is 'impossible to prove false', which means that it is impossible
to to prove it can't be done, which means that even though i don't know how
to do it there is no way i could prove that someone somewhere somehow
couldn't do it.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|