|
|
Posted by ushere on 10/14/05 04:15
"Bob Ford" <imagesinmotion@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:bg9uk1p8esfjcjfc2vu7hnj601b2j8ta31@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 02:33:54 GMT, "ushere"
> <kaywand@REMoVEaBUSebigpond.com> wrote:
>
>>ford mustang kick butt in it's day too.
>>
>>now it's a collectors item, just like svhs....
>>
>
> Really now, well I just happen to have a 1965 Mustang GT that can
> still kick butt on a lot of these rice burners and beamers ;-^)
oh i agree!!! and much nice lines too...
just like a good svhs vtr, looks professional, is solidly built and
generally, very reliable. hell, i had one in my rack untill a year or so
ago. impressed the clients with multi-format capabilities, though i hadn't
used it since (almost) the advent of dv...
leslie
>>"Gary Eickmeier" <geickmei@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>news:yTD3f.145527$xl6.116299@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>>>
>>>
>>> Lansworth wrote:
>>>> I couldn't phrase it better than what I put in my subject line, so I
>>>> won't: SVHS -- Apparently Kicks VHS's butt, but how does it compare to
>>>> others? I am aware it doesn't live up to formats like DVCAM, DVCPRO,
>>>> etc. (thats a given), but does it produce a fairly decent image? I have
>>>> heard it does have a fair amount of resolution, at about 400. Not
>>>> excellent, but better than VHS. Thoughts? I want to hear what you have
>>>> to say.
>>>>
>>> Why are you interested in SVHS?
>>>
>>> Gary Eickmeier
>>
> Bob Ford
> Images In Motion
> www.imagesinmotion.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|