|
|
Posted by AnthonyR on 11/13/05 02:57
"Jona Vark" <noemail@all.com> wrote in message
news:ZrKcf.15054$q%.7237@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "AnthonyR" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:9kpcf.4351$ek6.2339@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com...
>>
>> "Jona Vark" <noemail@all.com> wrote in message
>> news:ukhaf.12162$tV6.4196@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>> >
>> > "AnthonyR" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> > news:eM5af.10203$u43.6370@twister.nyc.rr.com...
>> >>
>> >>Because Liquid Edition uses is so very
>> >> memory intensive it might trigger issues that you have that other
>> >> software
>> >> doesn't trigger.
>> >
>> >
>> > LOL!
>> >
>> > sorry.. that's not really the way computers work..
>> >
>> >
>>
>> LOL... I just read this reply Jona,
>>
>> Are you sure?
>> I've been repairing computers since I built my for 8088 PC back in 1992
>> before the 286 Intel CPU.
>> When you have a bad memory chip it won't effect the PC until something
>> actually accesses that memory address.
>
> I have been designing and building computers since about '78. No that's
> not
> how they work. Memory is not necessarily allocated from the bottom up. At
> any point you can be using any portion of memory. The assertion that some
> program will 'tax' a computer more than others is an analogy to mechanical
> devices that isn't relevant.
>
>
Jona, really? mechanical devices?
Then why are RAM checking programs designed to run consecutive read and
writes to memory
address' over and over so to detect errors that only occur in certain
patterns or with extreme usage
and higher temperature that comes from extreme ram usage?
So memory intensive programs (photshop, 3d apps etc) DON'T tax memory is
what you are saying?
I have fixed quite a few blue screen of death problems and most were memory
related but then again
I haven't been designing and building PC's since 1978 like you. :)
what did you start with the Zeus, what was that kit computer called that was
out in 1980?
AnthonyR
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|