|
|
Posted by George Hammond on 10/04/71 11:29
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, GE wrote:
=======================
NOTE: Any comments from video experts
concerning this experiment will
be highly appreciated.
=======================
>
>
>George Hammond wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:07:41 GMT, George Hammond
>> <nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote:
>>
>> [Hammond]
>>
>> PPS:
>>
>> Ok, so here is what I envision happening:
>>
>> 1. Assume you edit the movie as theorized:
>>
>> <-----------------------------------------OneSecond(30Frames)----------------------------------------------->
>>
>>
>>
>> 01|...|...|...|05|...|...|...|09|...|...|...|13|...|...|...|17|...|...|...|21|...|...|...|25|...|...|...|29|...|----------etc-------->
>>
>>
>> 2. Assume the original movie is of a stage coach crossing the
>> badlands in the old west. The movie is basically light tan
>> and sand colored for the most part.
>>
>> 3. OK... suppose the "substitution frames" are all light tan
>> and near the average brightness of the original movie.
>>
>> 3. Then what I expect the 7 year old kid to see is nothing but a
>> light tan blank screen with maybe a little shimmer or flickering
>> on it. But NO VISIBLE movie.
>>
>> 4. HOWEVER, I expect that the adult will see a light tan screen
>> with a ghostly, perhaps flickering, but CLEARLY VISIBLE
>> stage coach coming out of the distance with Gabby Hayes holding
>> the reins and the Lone Ranger and Tonto fighting off a bunch of
>> bandits in hot pursuit.
>>
>>
>> Now, if that's what happens.... I'm going to call that a major
>> technological breakthrough!
>
>[GE]
>I've got it. I know just how to do it, to satisfy all of your
>requirements and more, ensure no flicker, yet have flash frames that
>will be visible only to adults.
[Hammond]
How can you be sure? The only way to "ensure" that it will
work is to have the flash frames of a DURATION that falls in between
the "minimum visible duration" for an adult and the "minimum visible
duration" for a 7 year old kid..... so far.... all sources indicate
it's between 25ms and 45 ms, which puts one frame of NTSC video right
in the middle (33 ms) of that range.
This should make the movie visible to adults (superliminal) but
invisible to kids (subliminal).
> I would tell you how I'm going to do it,
>but then I'd have to kill you.
[Hammond]
Don't go into a manic fit Gary.
Pull yourself together.
Try to Remember.... two heads are better than one!
>In any case, you can't know the content until you test it on yourself,
>or else it won't be much of a test. I just need to play with the
>technical aspects of it and find the appropriate footage.
>GE
[Hammond]
You're not going to start playing games are you?
Don't try to drag me into any dopey pseudoscientific
"top secret ideas" of yours.
I've already layed out in exact detail above a plan that will work
based on known science.... I'm not going to let you drag me into any
of your "top secret research" ideas for crying out louds!
Sheesh....
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|