|
|
Posted by Invid Fan on 10/04/13 11:29
In article <slrndl5p63.19s.nospam@debian.dns2go.com>, Justin
<nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
> Invid Fan wrote on [Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:02:42 -0400]:
> > In article <uub5l1po1df7fm7etj9muec183gmpp1agv@4ax.com>, Rich
> > <none@none.com> wrote:
> >> However, should HDTV and digital sets have an analog
> >> tuner-convert in them since some programming is still
> >> being broadcast in analog form? How long should this be
> >> continued, having the analog tuner included?
> >
> > So long as digital signals don't reach 100% of the country.
>
> Analogue signals don't reach 100% of the country.
and those people don't need tv's :) But my point is that so long as
there's a market where people can get analog but not digital signals,
analog tv's will be sold. They may eventually cost more then HD due to
low production runs, but they'll be made.
Personally I plan on doing without HD until my current set dies, which
with luck will be far in the future.
--
Chris Mack "Refugee, total shit. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
-'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|