|
|
Posted by Andrew Reilly on 11/06/24 11:28
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:43:38 -0400, Jerry Avins wrote:
> Remember, you need one sample for every pixel. Otherwise, you don't know
> what it is.
Not necessarily. Remember Radium said that he's imagining a psychedelic
entertainment system (of a remarkably slow sort...) How many pixels are
described by each bit, and how, is determined entirely by his
(unspecified) encoding.
Think postscript or PDF. In postscript I can make an entire page any
colour I like with a few bytes, irrespective of the final resolution of
the page. Obviously Radium's encoding may be different, but since his
information delivery rate and frame/sample rates are so low, I don't
imagine the result being very interesting.
Cheers,
--
Andrew
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|