|
|
Posted by Goro on 10/15/34 11:39
Ken Maltby wrote:
> "Bob" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
> news:43eba1b1.10875265@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> > On 9 Feb 2006 10:23:34 -0800, "Goro" <evilninjax@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> For example, Shrink could be provinding a pointer in one numerical
> >>> representation like unsigned int (because the clip is small) whereas
> >>> AGK could be treating it as unsigned long, which would put garbage in
> >>> the most significant digits and force the pointer way past the place
> >>> it needs to point to.
> >
> >>this isn't even remotely what's happening.
> >
> > Prove it.
> >
> >
>
> First you can't do it in C or Assembler, by accident. Any
> competent programmer would pay some attention to the errors
> that would be thrown up if you tried to do what you describe.
> I know that to be true for MS C 5.0 and later. Then there is
> what the OS will allow in terms of data exchange. But the
> most laughable thing is your idea that a larger precision format
> has any trouble accurately representing a lower precision number.
of corse the other thing is: How is DVDShrink passing a pointer to
"AutoGK"? (I say AutoGK in quotes since it's really a GUI/Script
engine for AVISynth, VOBSub, etc.)
-goro-
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|