|
|
Posted by spikeandpoo on 03/19/06 08:00
doc wrote:
> studio 9 far more stable? that's a long shot. we couldn't get it to
> install on one machine, crashed often on two others, and the one would run
> for a maxium of 8 minutes. studio 8 was unstable but at least one could
> learn what made it crash and keep it running.
>
> drd
>
> "nappY Si" <nlei123@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:KP31SK6738794.5150694444@anonymous.poster...
> > http://www.dmnforums.com/cgi-bin/readwholethread.cgi?forum=dmn_reviews&post=060125004002.htm&toppostid=1788
> >
> > FROM: 1071PETE
> > DATE: Mar. 11, 2006 4:36 pm
> > I have been with Studio from the early days, and when it works,
> > it is really good. But it has been a real struggle, to be fair I
> > should have ditched a long time ago. 10 Plus was and still is a
> > disaster, even with the 10.5 patch. I know my way round a PC,
> > but had little free time so had my dedicated system set up with
> > 10 by a professional, the machine updated where needed, in fact
> > more than twice the recomended spec, all tuned by a specialist
> > company, Pinnacles agent, mind you. I ought to have taken the
> > hint, as they were not too happy working with Studio, but I
> > guess they did not want to turn away business.
> >
> > I have gone back to version 9, it is far more stable.
> >
> > Pinnacles/Avid have a real nerve in offering for sale to a
> > public who in the main are probably not PC saavy, a piece of
> > merchandise that clearly does not do what it says it will do. To
> > me, it is totally unacceptable, dishonest, immoral, and if
> > tested in a law court, probably illegal.
> >
> >
> >
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|