|
|
Posted by Dave on 03/24/06 22:30
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:37:41 GMT, Lordy.UK <spam@recycle.bin> wrote:
>Bit of an over-simplification, they pay a small royalty to the Russian
>version of the RIAA, but that does not mean they have the permission of
>the actual copyright holders to do what they do.
Under Russian law they do. This is why they can sell Beatles tracks
while itunes can't. Which reminds me of another famous copyright case
involving the apple computer company and the Beatles record label -
what was it called again?????
--
Remove any underwear before replying by email
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|