|
|
Posted by Alpha on 10/06/71 11:43
"Fred C. Dobbs" <nus@tenretni.moc> wrote in message
news:f0gd2217vquo8ecql0pbi8oo53ck27b5fb@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 09:38:44 -0500, Allan
> <Spamsucks@finallykantica22admitstobebrianlamb.org> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:44:08 -0800, "Alpha" <x@x.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>That says nothing other than they WILL use networks for the AACS.
>>>
>>
>>"In other words, not only will playback of AACS-protected content not
>>require an Internet connection, it will never require one."
>>
>>Yeah... that's exactly what it says.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
>>because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable
>>from
>>-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free
>>time."
>>- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
>
> Again read the last part of the article.
>
> "Internet connectivity will be used by the managed copy feature, which
> remains a critical point of contention among members of AACS and the
> companies seeking license agreements to employ AACS technology.
> Indeed, Doherty admitted, the fact that parties cannot yet agree about
> how to implement this feature - or even what certain terms should mean
> - is why AACS remains an "interim" specification today, and not a
> complete one. More from Richard Doherty's interview with us,
> including his take on the whole 1080i / 1080p resolution debacle,
> tomorrow on TG Daily"
>
> I take interpet that to mean that somewhere down the line the will
> require the internet connection.
Thank you for finding this. They took down the link...probably because the
article is of suspect veracity.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|