|
|
Posted by Diablos Rojos on 10/18/95 11:43
"DubDriver" <dubdriver@somewhere.co.uk> wrote in message
news:aaednZ8tRcvB8rXZnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@pipex.net...
> Diablos Rojos wrote:
> || "DubDriver" <dubdriver@somewhere.co.uk> wrote in message
> || news:iuadnb19BaqZyLXZRVnysQ@pipex.net...
> ||| Diablos Rojos wrote:
> ||||| "FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> wrote in message
> ||||| news:1143483422.983139.133910@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> ||||||
> |||||| Signal wrote:
> ||||||| What is obvious to most is that approx $0.07c per track is so
> ||||||| stupidly cheap, something is amiss.
> ||||||
> |||||| How does AllofMP3 music even sound? Is there an average bit-rate
> |||||| (Yes, I know that quality can be indpendent of BR)? Maybe it's
> |||||| so cheap because you're getting what you pay for?
> ||||||
> |||||
> ||||| CD quality 320kbps
> |||
> ||| .... converted on-demand from allofmp3's 128KBps mp3 archive!? ...
> ||| well of course I don't know that for a fact but then nobody except
> ||| allofmp3 staff know in what format the original files are stored
> ||| before they are convert to the type you request.
> |||
> ||
> || Here we go again........
>
> Yes, here you go again not understanding my proposal
>
Understood you perfectly, you are quite clearly guessing as you yourslef
stated, hence the format of my reply.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|