|
Posted by Duggy on 04/01/06 03:34
selaboc wrote:
> Duggy wrote:
> > c64fan@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > No it wasn't so no it doesn't.
> > You're the only one still making that claim.
> > > All of the blame is yours.
> > No.
> Sorry, but it STILL is all yours.
Isn't.
> > > It wasn't ambiguious, just because you refuse to admit it doesn't
> > > change that fact.
> > It was, and you know it.
> It wasn't and you know it.
Was.
> > > Since the only one lying here is you.
> > Sentence fragment.
> yes it was. Noticed it after I posted. Didn't care enough to post a
> correction.
Fair enough. Why is it mistakes are far more obvious the second you
hit send?
> > > Better than your fanatsy.
> > Your reality
> *IS* the real reality.
Isn't.
> > is a better fantasy than my fantasy, yeah. But at least
> > my reality is real.
> In your dreams.
No. In my dreams is fantasy. My reality is real.
> > Because I love you.
> Sorry, I don't swing that way.
You like men?
> > No, I think the most vocal and abusive time I did was, though.
> liar
Nope.
> So you claim. Google tells the story of what did happen, not what you
> wish happened.
Google agrees with me.
> really!
Not really.
> > I've accepted that it could be seen the way you said, so I'll let you
> > claim it if you really want.
> how kind.
Very.
> > An ambiguous sentence is an ambiguous sentence.
> And the one you claim was, wasn't
You are the only one who thinks it.
> Read in context.
The context wasn't helpful.
> You do know what context is, since you claim to have
> an English degree, one would assume that is something (along with
> reading comprehension)
You say I don't have that. Which is it?
> you'd have to have learned in order to get one.
> It's the lack of evidence that you have learned those things (based
> solely on the posts you've made) that lead me to the conclusion that
> your degree is ficticious.
Your conclusion is false. That's hardly unsual.
> Why do you think it worries me? I'm not the one demanding acceptance
> from others.
Then who is?
===
= DUG.
===
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|