Posted by Trevor on 04/02/06 18:12

On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 06:20:35 GMT, "Camper" <greentoow@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:

>
>"Trevor" <beanerana@.invalid.net> wrote in message
>news:fbjo22lt4spjdann0kt6iavun7mje3d6e3@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:10:19 -0600, me@privacy.net wrote:
>>
>>>"J Brockley" <jbrockley@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Thats why you go for a hard drive model and get a real improvement over
>>>>VCR.
>>>
>>>So its best NOT to waist time on a DVD burner only
>>>model with no hard drive especially if used mainly for
>>>time shifting?
>>
>> I would agree with that, FWIW.
>> Time shifting without a HDD would be painful.
>
>Not a problem at all using RAM on a panny.

Only if you don't mind babysitting your recorder. DVD-RAM has similar
recording time limitations as the other two media choices. Like I
said, painful.

• Next in forum: Re: How to transfer from one format to an other ?
• Prev in forum: Re: I'm late at installing XP SP2, what to watch out for?
• Thread view: Re: Please explain this: DVDR's less convenient than VCR?

[Reply to this message]