|
Posted by David McCall on 04/02/06 23:55
"Larry J." <usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns979985ED19C86thefrogprince@70.169.32.36...
>
> Yes, plenty of us have done this many times.
>
> If the fonts used in the PP presentation are too small to read when
> projected, they will be way to small to read if converted to video.
>
> In which case, the PP presentation needs to be redone to the proper
> fonts and aspect ratio.
>
> Then there are a few ways to get it into the video. PP can
> "export" its slides as Jpeg files which can be used with any NLE
> system.
>
> Or, the PP show can be run from the computer through a scan
> converter to videotape, or patched directly into the NLE, or
> switched live during the event, if that's an option.
>
> You just need to learn what's the best method for you...
>
The advantage of the scan converter is that you get to keep the animation.
With JPEGS you loose all of that unless you recreate it in your NLE.
The advantage of the Jpegs is that some of the time you can
rework the graphics to make them more readable. People making
PowerPoint presentations break every video rule you can think of.
They use fonts that are way too small. They use color combinations
that are often very unforgiving in video, and the run text and graphics
much too close to the edge of the frame.
I find that using PowerPoint presentations are almost as much, if not
more, work than creating the graphics from scratch. The exception
is when you can talk to the presenter before the presentation is created,
and convince them to take these concerns into account when designing
the presentation.
David
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|