|
|
Posted by NunYa Bidness on 11/05/05 09:39
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 13:43:57 GMT, spam@uce.gov (Bob) Gave us:
>On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 21:04:19 GMT, NunYa Bidness
><nunyabidness@nunyabidness.org> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:08:30 GMT, spam@uce.gov (Bob) Gave us:
>>
>>>On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:10:48 -0800, "Richard C."
>>><post-age@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>There is no VALID reason NOT to top post in this day and age.
>>>>
>>>>Get over it.
>>>
>>>There are several very good reasons not to top post on a Usenet forum.
>>>
>>>You get over it.
>>
>> There is only two that should be examined closely.
>>
>>A) a modicum of order
>>
>>B) agreement to diplomatically follow protocol, instead of casting
>>everything out like a punk.
>>
>> A third would be natural chronology... naturally.
>
>I would add "courtesy" to the list.
>
>When someone top posts, they force the reader to go fishing thru the
>content below. That is a real nuisance.
>
>Snip the irrelevant crap and put your response below the relevant
>content. Keep only two generations of previous content at most.
I wish I could be more diplomatic with these people, but most of
them these days do it even after having it explained to them. They
are like the assholes that sit on the pool tables at the pool hall.
No respect for the equipment that they did not pay for. Somebody
needs to start walking up to them, and breaking their cues.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|