|
Posted by Gene E. Bloch on 04/25/06 22:20
On 4/25/2006, Ken Moiarty posted this:
> "StsAlive" <two@daybtinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:sYKdnRZuU8Z1JNDZRVnyvw@bt.com...
>> <snip>
>> I suppose it was considered the safer option rather than have home users
>> coastering lotsa DVD's.
>>
>> The other thought is that it does slightly hinder mass production
>> copying............though it would be slow one per time it's even
>> slowwwweeeeeeerrrrr having to go through that finalizing routine.
>>
>
> Yes, I can see the DRM (digital rights management) rationale behind it. But
> I'm not so sure that rationale is very sound. I mean, the reasoning seems to
> be similar to the idea of banning the legal ownership of handguns by all
> citizens in order to significantly cut down on the use of firearms by
> criminals. But the career criminal largely figures out how to get around
> such measures, proving such to be no more than mere inconveniences, whilst
> many a law abiding citizen ends up being needlessly "penalized". It would
> seem to me in like manner that many DRM measures seek to curtail digital
> functionality to all consumers in the desperate hope of "maybe" reducing
> piracy, while those organized criminals who are in the business of digital
> content piracy on a genuinely threatening scale, have both, the resources and
> the talent to work around most if not all such, largely petty, measures.
>
> Ken
In truth, finalizing has nothing to do with DRM, just with the
structure of the CD and DVD file systems. Basically, they don't really
have a directory until they are finalized. However, the originating
recorder knows its own particular way that it encodes discs, so it
*can* read them.
That's why the recorder can add more data to the disc until it's
finalized, and why other players can't read them.
If someone had spec'd a sort of preliminary directory and required all
CDs and DVDs to use it and all players to understand it, then all
players could read unfinalized discs. But I guess writable discs came
along after the original read-only discs were spec'd, and it was too
late. I am speculating on this part.
Gino
--
Gene E. Bloch (Gino)
letters617blochg3251
(replace the numbers by "at" and "dotcom")
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|