|
|
Posted by Don M. on 05/04/06 22:53
"anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message news:4ag9caFrj1g7U1@individual.net...
> <snip>
>
> (Which might of course be less then two - really, this was settled to
> everyone's satisfaction some time ago - I am not sure why you keep
> bringing it up).
>
==========
I bring it up just for fun, to remind you that you lost the argument to Hammerer - big
time. Sort of "rubbing salt in people's wounds". <VBG>
This was settled to everyone's satisfaction indeed; we all agreed that your error was
egregious, yes.
> > BTW, it is 'fewer leeches', not 'less leeches'.
>
> I expect I could defend myself, but as I also like to be a grammar-nazi
> at times, I lift my hat to you, you cunning linguist you!
Lift it again. It should be "less than two", not "less then two", unless you meant that
thousands become less (such as one thousand) and then become two, in which case you could
be right.
> >
> > NP: "I Was Country When Country Wasn't Cool" - Barbara Mandrell
>
> Hey when did country get cool? - I missed it ;)
Country got cool around November. You should try leaving the computer room once in a
while and see what the weather is like on the outside, really.
Don
*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|