|
Posted by doc on 05/23/06 04:35
interesting synopsis as this was exactly what we found. the little guy were
using FCP because that is what they learned on . . and they were all
working for peanuts, however the 11 bigger houses we visited used avid, let
alone the NAB nyc meeting i spoke of in an earlier thread that was avid.
i also watch the credits a lot and see avid continually although i have yet
to see a FC anthing or even apple in the editing credits. but i do keep
looking.
drd
"nappy" <gospam@yourself.com> wrote in message
news:yAkcg.75432$_S7.46429@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Mr. Tapeguy" <mr.tapeguy@pro-tape.com> wrote in message
> news:1148300983.551180.277390@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> nappy wrote:
>>
>>> > That was the case for many years but is no longer the case. Last time
>>> > I checked the Mac had around 50% market share as a PLATFORM (which
>>> > could include Final Cut, Avid and Media 100 primarily) and PC's were
>>> > around 70% since many facilities use both. That was mid-to-late 2005.
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh.. this is so unprovable.. Come on. man. No one ever really does
>>> surveys
>>> on this stuff.. it is all exaggeration and guessing. You vaselate
>>> between
>>> logic and hype.
>>
>> Actually there was a survey done. I can't remember where it was - I
>> think DV Magazine, although I'm not sure. You may disagree with me but
>> sorry Nappy, I don't make stuff up. Really.
>
> A survey? Are you serious? DV Magazine?
>
> That's sad tapeguy.
>
> DV Magazine.
>
> here'' I can tell you what the situation really is.
>
> There are TONS of FCP rigs here in LA. Mostly independents and low budget
> folks. Editors work on these rigs for as little as $5/hour. A great
> percentage of them are doing 'deferred' work.. which means the movie sucks
> and the work is free.
> In higher end facilities there are indeed FCP rigs. A large percentage of
> them are there to handle any of those indy folks who can beg enough money
> to finish somewhere. But the pricey rooms in those facilities are running
> avids.
>
> Most all of the high end work is still done on Avids. however, there are
> plenty of facilities using the other editors also, Premiere, Liquid.. etc.
>
> Like the mac, FCP is making inroads because people are buying them to run
> in their homes. The Mac achieved its user base by inundating universities
> with them and when those people graduated they had a built in bias. FCP is
> achieving the same thing. Surely doesn;t make it any better than anything
> else out there. It's just the brainwashed mac crowd.... Probably a good
> South Park in there somewhere.. like the "Hybrid" episode.
>
> DV Magazine.. what a joke.
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> http://www.pro-tape.com
>>
>> Adobe - Allume - Apple - Avid - Canon - Denon - Digidesign - Panasonic
>> - Sony
>>
>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|