|
|
Posted by nappy on 10/05/29 11:48
"Mr. Tapeguy" <mr.tapeguy@pro-tape.com> wrote in message
news:1148445039.384987.263230@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> I have never ONCE used a source that you considered valid.
true.
> Not my own
> experience nor that of my customers or colleauges.
What experieince would that be.
>Not DV Magazine,
> nor Videomaker nor Consumer Reports nor the Wall Street Journal.
Two amatuer ad rags and the Wall Street Journal. Hmmm.. I'm convinced.
>You
> shoot every one of them down because they don't validate your opinion.
> That doesn't make them any LESS valid; rather, the fact that the data
> doesn't support you makes YOUR claims less valid.
What data?
>
> Well at least you admit there are tons of FCP rigs in L.A.
Yes.. a grat many of them idle in film student's apartments. But they are
there.
> What makes you think your absurdly biased view of
> the world carries any credibility?
There's nothing absurd about it. And as you may have noticed.. i am not
alone.
> It is true that Mac gets an edge by seeding product at universities.
> Other than that, many people (including competent Avid editors) just
> like it. Or, they may prefer Avid but appreciate Apple's value. OR,
> they may use a Mac-based Avid.
Waiting for a point there...
>
> I'm sure if I read other industry magazines regularly I would find
> additional praise for Apple and FCS. You wouldn't give in if the sweet
> Lawzy Jeezus came down and told you to hisself.
Apple also advertises in those magazines.Look.. using magazines to support
anything is pointless.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|