|
|
Posted by Richard Crowley on 06/02/06 00:11
"doc" <doc@anywhere.com> wrote in message
news:9CHfg.4898$Oa3.1903@trndny09...
> this is great! i recently worked with a client as a sub contractor
> who had a $100,000 Sony HD 24p camera on this major shoot for them
> (rented cam by the way) and i just happened to have my dvx100b there
> and with a pro tripod just followed along the shoot as they did only
> some of it behind the scenes instead, but still i did get some of the
> footage as did they. in addition, because of the size of my cam, i
> shot some handheld with a low angle using the handle and was looking
> for some neat angle effects. when they sat down to edit, their video
> was all pixelated and messed up, apparently some issue with tracking
> to which they were refunded their rental when the camera was found to
> be out of alignment. so, he just happened to think about my being
> there and collected my footage and compared it to their former work
> from two weeks earlier and guess what, my images were nearly as good
> as theirs (said he) and my camera was less than his rental :o) so
> much for HD and expensive cameras
Even cheap cameras look good when the subject is properly lighted,
blocked, etc.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|